The Arctic as a resource base
What’s wrong with Russia’s official documents on the Arctic.
News
Publish date: December 8, 1998
Written by: Thomas Nilsen
News
The spent nuclear fuel shipment that Lebed refused to receive comes from the Ukrainian Zaporozhkaya nuclear power plant. Its arrival to Zheleznogorsk (former Krasnoyarsk-26) in Siberia is confirmed by the Krasnoyarsk branch of the State Nuclear Inspection (Gosatomnadzor) and by local environmental activists.
The reason why Lebed tried to stop the shipment from Ukraine was that it was underpaid. Lebed wanted twice as much for receiving the spent nuclear fuel, and he wanted it to be paid in cash, not by barter agreements, as it has been lately. Ukraine settled its debts by barter in vegetable oil, other foodstuffs and even by providing winter boots to the employees at the Zheleznogorsk nuclear complex.
This was not the first disagreement between Krasnoyarsk Krai*) and Ukraine on the payment for spent nuclear fuel. In 1992, Krasnoyarsk refused to send casks to Ukraine for shipping spent fuel from the VVER-1000 reactors. The cask transportation was halted for almost two years. The RT-2 storage in Zheleznogorsk is the only central storage for spent nuclear fuel from VVER-1000 reactors ever built in the former Soviet Union.
Russian environmental activists say the transportation of spent nuclear fuel from abroad to storage in Russia violates the federal legislation. The law states that it is not allowed to import nuclear waste for disposal in Russia. The Russian ministry of nuclear energy (Minatom) claims that it does not violate the federal legislation since the fuel is to be reprocessed into new fuel for export.
"This statement is highly controversial. Spent nuclear fuel from Ukrainian VVER-1000 reactors cannot be reprocessed in Russia," says Vladimir Slivyak, head of the Anti-Nuclear Campaign of the Socio-Ecological Union. Construction of the RT-2 plant in Zheleznogorsk – the only reprocessing facility in Russia that would have been able to reprocess spent fuel from this type of reactor – was halted in 1989. At the time the project was halted, the facility was 30-40% complete.
"But the present economical crisis (in Russia) has given Minatom one more reason to lobby the government to allow further transportation of foreign nuclear waste into Russia in exchange for hard currency," says Slivyak.
While Lebed demands more payment for receiving spent nuclear fuel from Ukraine, environmental groups in Krasnoyarsk fear he would also start lobbying to receive spent nuclear fuel from other countries in exchange for hard currency. Located in eastern Siberia, Krasnoyarsk is an easy place for countries like South Korea and Japan to ship its spent nuclear fuel.
*) The Russian word "Krai" is used here, as it denotes a region with more inner self control than a county, yet less than a republic.
What’s wrong with Russia’s official documents on the Arctic.
As uranium supplies from Russia fall under the shadow of potential sanctions, and while Ukraine’s allies look to wean themselves off nuclear fuel produced by Moscow’s Rosatom corporation, owners of left-for-dead mines in the US are looking to revive their deposits.
The European Union doubled its purchases of Russian nuclear fuel in 2023, data from Eurostat and the UN’s international trade service Comtrade show.
The output of Russian nuclear power plants in 2023 decreased by 2.8% compared to 2022. A decrease in output occurred for the first time in 10 years a...