Putin leaves Kazakhstan without deal to build nuclear plant
A visit last week by Vladimir Putin and a Kremlin entourage to Astana, Kazakhstan sought in part to put Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear corporation, on good footing with local officials.
News
Publish date: April 30, 2009
Written by: Anna Kireeva
Translated by: Charles Digges
News
Sweden’s position is a remarkable case. In 1980, the country voted in a nationwide referendum close down the country’s nuclear power plants over the next 30 years. Now, three decades later, no one has any plans to follow through with that referendum. Many have said that the referendum was simply a recommendation in spirit, and the country’s government is saying that there are no alternatives to nuclear power to assure the country’s energy supply.
“This is a very sensitive sphere,” said Urban Ahlin, the deputy chief of the parliarmentary committee during a meeting with Russian journalists as part of a seminar put together by Sweden’s bureau for radiation safety. According to Ahlin, the Social Democrats opposed the government’s decision to build new reactors in the country.
“It is premature to talk about building new (nuclear) plants,” he said, adding that with Sweden’s current hydro-electic and nuclear plants “we can accommodate our industry with cheap electricity,” he said. “
Photo: www.riksdagen.se
We are for searching out other alternative sources of energy for substitute for nuclear power and if we find them we will use the – but we will not risk the position of hour industry on the world market.Swedish-Russian cooperation
Ahlin said that Sweden supports a radiation and nuclear safety programme, improvements to waste storage methods and dealing with spent nuclear fuel. “We are glad that (Russian Prime Minister Vladimir) Putin and (Russian President Dmitry) Medvedev are beginning to talk about the safety of nuclear technology and to renew discussions on strategic weapons reductions.”
He said that the world financial crisis caused apprehension as nations will be able to devote less of nuclear safety. “It would be good if the Swedish Government could spend more money on these goals,” he said.
The Russian-Swedish nuclear safety cooperation programme is probably on of the most fruitful and only brings hope that even better things are to come. Ahlin expressed the worry that Russia mioght not want to cooperate with Sweden because Sweden does not buy Russian gas and is not dependent on it for energy needs like much of Europe. “If you follow Putin’s travels, you will notice he practically does not visit any countries that don’t buy Russian gas,” said Ahlin.
In speaking of fossile fuels, Ahlin expressed confidence that in the current world situation, countries mush diversify their economics, wean themselves off oil, and put their profits from the oil and gas industry into the development of renewable energy and energy efficiency.
A visit last week by Vladimir Putin and a Kremlin entourage to Astana, Kazakhstan sought in part to put Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear corporation, on good footing with local officials.
Russia is formally withdrawing from a landmark environmental agreement that channeled billions in international funding to secure the Soviet nuclear legacy, leaving undone some of the most radioactively dangerous projects and burning one more bridge of potential cooperation with the West.
While Moscow pushes ahead with major oil, gas and mining projects in the Arctic—bringing more pollution to the fragile region—the spoils of these undertakings are sold to fuel Russia’s war economy, Bellona’s Ksenia Vakhrusheva told a side event at the COP 29, now underway in Baku, Azerbaijan.
A survey of events in the field of nuclear and radiation safety relating to Russia and Ukraine.