Monthly Highlights from the Russian Arctic, October 2024
In this news digest, we monitor events that impact the environment in the Russian Arctic. Our focus lies in identifying the factors that contribute to pollution and climate change.
News
Publish date: February 14, 2014
News
Shortly after the Norwegian Parliament’s Constitutional and Control Committee’s Mongstad hearing (read more here and here) representatives from Canadian SaskPower joined Bellona to talk about CCS. Manager of Carbon capture Technologies, Max Ball and Supervisor of Chemical Services, Colin Campbell came from Canada to tell Norwegian actors about the history behind their CCS facility at Boundary Dam, as well as answer questions about the imminent opening of the facility.
Max Ball confirmed that their project in Canada will be operational “on time and on budget.” He also stressed that the project has not been significantly scaled down and modified, as a number of Norwegian CCS actors have claimed during the Mongstad hearings.
– In the planning phase of the project we of course had to make changes as new information became available, but the project has never been down scaled, Ball emphasized. This consequently mean that some actors have given the Parliament Committee wrong information about the Boundary Dam project.
After the last hearing day representatives from the Norwegian liberal party (Venstre) pronounced in Norwegian press that Norway should look at options for full-scale CCS beyond Norway. Bellona leader Frederic Hauge, who has been present at the Mongstad hearings, is firm that:
– If the government, as they have outlined in their governing platform, will go above and beyond their climate agreement [Klimaforliket], one must establish a full-scale plant on Norwegian soil. Bellona of course supports every initiative to contribute to global CO2 reductions and technology development in other countries, but this does not mean that Norwegian politicians can break their own climate commitments.
Bellona’s Sirin Engen presented options for future CCS development in Norway:
– Bellona, along with the many world leading Norwegian CCS operators will now look at the future of CCS in Norway. We will learn from both Mongstad and successful projects like Boundary Dam and see how Norway can exploit the knowledge we have garnered from over 40 years of offshore oil and gas development, said Engen. – We are convinced that it is necessary to look at the overall development of CO2 capture and storage, and our contribution to this can certainly be to find good methods for storing CO2 in the North Sea, she continued.
How the EU chooses to shape their climate and energy policy in the future will have a lot to say for CCS both in Norway and globally. Marika Andersen from Bellona’s Brussels office stressed that the EU recognizes the need for CCS in the years 2020 and 2030, as outlined in the 2030 framework proposal (read more here):
– One thing is such acknowledgment, another is the provision og flexible mechanisms to ensure the financial and political support new technologies such as CCS needs, Andersen underlined in her presentation.
The Bellona CCS Forum was established as an arena where Norwegian actors can exchange experiences and information about the development of CO2 capture and storage ( CCS ). The goal is to provide updated information about ongoing processes in the EU and the European Technology Platform for CCS (ZEP).
Original article in Norwegian by Bellona’s Maya Boutroue Vedeld.
In this news digest, we monitor events that impact the environment in the Russian Arctic. Our focus lies in identifying the factors that contribute to pollution and climate change.
A survey of events in the field of nuclear and radiation safety relating to Russia and Ukraine.
A visit last week by Vladimir Putin and a Kremlin entourage to Astana, Kazakhstan sought in part to put Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear corporation, on good footing with local officials.
Russia is formally withdrawing from a landmark environmental agreement that channeled billions in international funding to secure the Soviet nuclear legacy, leaving undone some of the most radioactively dangerous projects and burning one more bridge of potential cooperation with the West.