The system built to manage Russia’s nuclear legacy is crumbling, our new report shows
Our op-ed originally appeared in The Moscow Times. For more than three decades, Russia has been burdened with the remains of the Soviet ...
News
Publish date: December 22, 2005
Written by: Vera Ponomareva
News
The controversial NGO bill passed its second crucial reading in the Russian State Duma Wednesday. Once it passes through the Federation Council, the Parliaments upper chamber, it will become law as soon as it is signed by President Vladimir Putin.
The amendments forbid the activity of foreign and international organizations closed cities, or ZATOs in their Russian abbreviation. Russian NGOs in ZATOs, however, can receive foreign funding, but only "in the order established by the Russian government."
Meanwhile, these closed cities inherited from Soviet Union still remain totalitarian antidemocratic entities, where all forms of civil activity are restricted. Once the bastions of the Soviet Unions nuclear effort, the 10 closed cities have remained since the Soviet collapse time capsules from the bad old days.
Over the past 12 years, foreign funds began investing into various programmes in closed cities, particularly in projects concerning non-proliferation and legal education.
"The proposed amendments though will stop this process and set the closed cities back in their progress by many years," said Nadezhda Kutepova, the chairwoman of the Planet of Hopes NGO in Ozersk the notorious Mayak Chemical Combines hometown, in an interview with Bellona Web.
Planet of Hopes—an ecological organization which is defending human rights in the most contaminated area of Russia—has survived on western grants for three years.
Kutepova predicted the NGO bill will not only ban the activity of foreign organizations in closed cities but also define the way of thinking for the bureaucracy that governs them. That means that with the passage of the bill, NGOs will have problems even with foreign funding.
The basic argument of those who support this amendment is that closed cities were established and exist to secure military and nuclear plants located there. But Kutepova points it out that today the secret installations themselves live on western money. Thus, the fissile materials storage facility built at the Mayak plant in 2003 was part of US-Defense Department run Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) programme. American contractors took part in the construction.
Our op-ed originally appeared in The Moscow Times. For more than three decades, Russia has been burdened with the remains of the Soviet ...
The United Nation’s COP30 global climate negotiations in Belém, Brazil ended this weekend with a watered-down resolution that failed to halt deforest...
For more than a week now — beginning September 23 — the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) has remained disconnected from Ukraine’s national pow...
Bellona has taken part in preparing the The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2025 and will participate in the report’s global launch in Rome on September 22nd.