News
Publish date: January 7, 2000
Written by: Jon Gauslaa
News
Commentary:
When Aleksandr Nikitin was acquitted on December 29, 1999, the St. Petersburg prosecutors office immediately announced that it would appeal, and it kept its word.
Gutsans groundless appeal
Nikitins defence has now been familiarised with the he content of the appeal. It became somewhat astonished to discover that the appeal only consists of the following:
I consider the ruling of the City Court to be wrong since it has been taken in contradiction with the factual content of the case. I demand the ruling to be dismissed and the case forwarded to consideration by another judge.
Believe it or not, but that is all prosecutor Gutsan has to say. He gives absolutely no reasons for his claim that the ruling contradicts the factual content of the case, but hints that he may come up with more after having studied the protocol of the court hearing.
It will, however, be impossible for Gutsan to substantiate his claim. Two thirds of the verdict deals with the facts described in the indictment and the evidence of the case. Thus, the verdict is indeed based on the facts. But more important: it is based on the Constitution and not on the secret and retroactive decrees, which were the sole basis for Gutsans case.
It is easy to understand why the prosecutor demands another judge. Sergei Golets turned out to be an independent judge. He did not take the FSBs biased allegations for granted, but evaluated the case objectively and based his decision on the law.
This seems to have taken Gutsan by surprise, since the mans performance throughout the trial suggested that the only judges he had met before were judges acting as his co-prosecutors. Actually, this was quite normal in Soviet times, and according to various sources it still occurs. However, as the Russian judiciary is slowly adapting to the Rule of Law and the Constitution, such incidents are not so common as they used to be. So, hopefully Mr. Gutsans attempt will turn out to be a last blast from the past.
It is too early to predict when the Supreme Court will handle the appeal case, but it has to come up with one of the three following decisions:
It goes without saying that only the first of these possibilities is acceptable. The prosecutors appeal is utterly groundless and if the Supreme Court should approve it or return the case to additional investigation, such a decision will clearly not have been taken on the basis of the law.
However, I believe that the Supreme Court will realise this, and confirm the legal opinion that is expressed in the City Court verdict: That the Constitution is the supreme legislation of the Russian Federation.
Recent attacks on Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant "mark the beginning of a new and gravely dangerous front of the war," the UN atomic agency's director general said last week.
After years of inaction, Germany is working on its Carbon Management Strategy to resolve how CCS can play a role in climate action in industry. At the end of February, the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action published first key points and a proposal to amend the law Kohlenstoffdioxid Speicherungsgesetz (KSpG). Bellona Deutschland, who was actively involved in the previous stakeholder dialogue submitted a statement in the association hearing.
In the midst of a global discussion on whether natural gas should be used as a transitional fuel and whether emissions from its extraction, production, transport and use are significantly less than those from other fossil fuels, Russia has developed ambitious plans to increase its own production of liquified natural gas (LNG) in the Arctic – a region with 75% of proven gas reserves in Russia – to raise its share in the international gas trade.
In this news digest, we monitor events that impact the environment in the Russian Arctic. Our main focus lies in identifying the factors that contribute to pollution risks and climate change.