After Chernobyl we said ‘never again.’ Then came the war.
A version of this op-ed was first published in The Moscow Times. For the past 40 years, the wastes of the Chernobyl site have stood as a monument ...
News
Publish date: October 6, 1998
Written by: Runar Forseth
News
This very strong statement was brought forth by Erik Jurgens, rapporteur on legal affairs and human rights to the Council of Europe, in a letter to the president of the Russian supreme court, dated September 24. The currently chosen procedure appoints one professional judge and two lay jurors to hear the case, giving the FSB the possibility to choose the majority of the panel through its security clearance.
To alleviate the situation, which is prompted in part by there being too few qualified judges in Russia, Mr Jurgens proposes that the current configuration of the preceding panel is changed, so that it will constitute three professional judges instead of one judge and two lay jurors. Professional judges do not need FSB clearance according to Russian law.
A version of this op-ed was first published in The Moscow Times. For the past 40 years, the wastes of the Chernobyl site have stood as a monument ...
Bellona’s new Nuclear Digest for February is out now and catalogs a number of mounting pressures on Russia’s global nuclear footprint. From stalled p...
Over the past four years, civilian nuclear energy facilities have increasingly become targets of direct or indirect attacks in armed conflicts. The Z...
A new ISO standard was published last week to help port authorities, shipowners and operators navigate rules on how ships should be cleaned in an env...