PACE Human Rights Committee ‘Profoundly Concerned’ with Grigory Pasko’s Conviction

Publish date: September 5, 2003

Written by: Jon Gauslaa

In its recently adopted draft resolution, the Council of Europe's Parliamentary Assembly expressed fears that the conviction of renowned whistleblower Grigory Pasko carries the risk of putting Russian courts in a position where they become instruments of intimidation of the free word.

The Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly, or PACE, adopted on September 1st a draft resolution on the case of environmental journalist Grigory Pasko, with 34 votes for and one against. The main factual foundation for this decision was a report prepared by PACE’s special rapporteur, the German parliamentarian Rudolf Bindig.

Bindig, since being appointed as PACE’s rapporteur in April 2002, has evaluated a considerable amount of the Pasko case documents, and also met representatives of Pasko’s defence, the prosecution and the Russian Supreme Court in Moscow. Judging by Bindig’s report and the text of the now-adopted draft resolution, Russia still seems to have some way to go before it can take its place among the European nations ruled by law.

Russian Courts as Instruments of Intimidation
The committee’s resolution points out that Pasko’s case “remains of general interest for all those who are intent on protecting the freedom of the press and freedom of expression in general.” It stresses that the case of Pasko, as well as other cases, shows that the freedom of speech of Russian journalists and researchers is threatened by an obsessive spy-mania that is quickly spreading throughout Russia.

This state of affairs carries the “risk of putting Russia’s courts in the disagreeable position of becoming instruments of intimidation against critical journalists, scientists and others.”

The Committee’s Concerns
Even though the committee welcomes Pasko’s release from prison on parole in early 2003, it is still “profoundly concerned with the unusual features characterising the prosecution, trial and conviction of Pasko through the different instances of the Russian military courts.”

The committee emphasises, in particular, the legally flawed search procedure that was conducted in Pasko’s apartment during the pre-trial investigation; the fact that the conviction relied heavily on the now-defunct secret decree No. 055:96; the unusual divergences between the indictments and convictions, and a number of other fair trial issues.

The committee also points out that today’s Russian legislation on state secrets gives the security services wide latitude in prosecuting treason cases, “thus providing a formidable instrument of intimidation against courageous journalists such as Pasko.” The committee’s members invited their colleagues in the Russian parliament, the State Duma, to start work on legislation that would ensure that secret decrees never again become the basis for criminal convictions.

Pasko Case Shows the System’s ‘Grave Weaknesses’
The committee also asserts that the Pasko case has exposed “grave weaknesses and the need for greater transparency in the procedure before military tribunals, particularly in treason cases, where the secret nature of information, as determined by military experts, is of crucial importance.”

It calls on the governments of those countries that still have military courts to ensure that the procedural safeguards guaranteed by Articles 6 and 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights are fully applied within the military courts system as well as they should be in civilian trials.

The resolution has been forwarded to PACE’s Standing Committee, where its final adoption will take place on November 25 in Maastricht. The full text of the resolution is avvailable on PACE’s website.