News
Publish date: April 25, 2002
Written by: Jon Gauslaa
News
Ivan Pavlov, lawyer of Grigory Pasko, gave an overview over the conviction of his client in the Human Rights Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (CoE PA) today. Judged from the questions and comments that followed, he used the oportunity well.
Spirit of stalinism
Pavlov focused particularly on the lack of evidence against his client, and that Pasko had been convicted for being in the possession of personal notes that allegedly contained ‘state secrets’. Pavlov also underlined that the basis for the conviction was secret military decrees, forbidding Russian military servicemen to have off-duty relations with foreign citizens.
— The Pasko-case illustrates how strong and alive the spirit of stalinism is within the Russian and Ukrainian legal systems, said Ukrainian parlamentarian Sergei Holovaty, after having listened to Pavlov’s speech. He added that one of the major problem within both systems is the role of the state prosecutor. — The prosecutor does not only act as a prosecutor, but also as a judge, he said.
Vitaulas Landsbergis, former president of Lithuania and one of the major architects of the downfall of the iron curtain in the early 1990’ies, said that the Russian system of secret laws is a trap that any thinking individual can be caught in. — If Pasko’s notes were so important, what then with the thoughts in peoples’ heads, he asked.
Mr. Kovalev’s urge has to a certain extent already been followed up by the CoE PA. On Monday it appointed the German parliamentarian Rudolf Binding as its Rapporteur on the case.
Mr. Binding plans to visit both Pasko’s lawyers, representatives of the prosecution and if possible also Mr. Pasko himself. He is expected to present a preliminary report on the case on a later stage.
It is also likely that the CoE PA’s Sub-Committee on Human Rights will forward a request to the Russian authorities urging them to release Pasko from the pre-trial detention centre where he currently is being kept.
*****
Grigory Pasko was arrested on November 20, 1997 and accused with treason through espionage. He was acquitted by the Pacific Fleet Court in Vladivostok on these charges on July 20, 1999, but sentenced to a three-year imprisonment for misusing his position and released on a general amnesty. Both sides appealed the verdict.
In November 2000 the Russian Military Supreme Court cancelled the verdict, and sent the case back for a new trial at the Pacific Fleet Court. The re-trial started on July 11, 2001 and ended on December 25, with Pasko being convicted to four years of hard labour for treason and taken into custody. The verdict has led to huge protests inside of as well as outside Russia. Both sides have appealed against it, but the appeal case has not yet been scheduled.
Throughout the past year, our mission at the Bellona Environmental Transparency Center has focused on two key, but intertwined issues—nuclear and radiation safety as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine drags on, and the worldwide influence of Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear corporation, which itself is actively involved in the war and has participated in the occupation of a Ukrainian nuclear power plant.
At the beginning of the year, reports in the German and Russian press suggested an approximate 70% increase in uranium imports from Russia to Germany in 2024. But does this reflect broader European trends? It does not. Overall, imports of uranium and nuclear fuel from Russia to Western countries actually dropped sharply in 2024. Unlike the situation in Germany, this is already an established trend.
A Lingen, Germany plant could begin producing nuclear fuel in cooperation with a subsidiary of Rosatom, Russia's state nuclear corporation, which is directly involved in the war in Ukraine and occupying the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant.
In this news digest, we monitor events that impact the environment in the Russian Arctic. Our focus lies in identifying the factors that contribute to pollution and climate change.