After Chernobyl we said ‘never again.’ Then came the war.
A version of this op-ed was first published in The Moscow Times. For the past 40 years, the wastes of the Chernobyl site have stood as a monument ...
News
Publish date: September 27, 2008
Written by: Andrey Ozharovsky
News
In what is becoming a new emblem of arbitrary Russian secrecy, the decree appointing Kutin to the post was signed on September 20th, but not made public in the media or on government websites until five days later – a new policy many believe to be calculated to avert outcry or criticism.
Kutin’s an undistinguished bureaucratic career
Born in Leningrad in 1965, Kutin is holds a doctorate in technical science. He has worked in the St. Petersburg city administration as the deputy chairman of the city property committee, as well as the deputy director of the Russian Munitions Agency. Since 2005, he has been Rostekhnadzor’s deputy director, Konstantin Pulikovsky, who resigned the post at his own request.
Pulikovsky presided over some of Rostekhnadzor’s most notoriously disputed state environmental impact studies for nuclear power stations, oil and gas pipelines and other dangerous installations.
Pulikovsky’s resignation draws an era of embarrassment to a close
Photo: www.gosnadzor.ru
Other dubious items in Pulikovsky’s resume include granting engineered life span extensions to some of the oldest and most dangerous reactors in Russia. Among them were reactors at the Bilibin and Novovornezh nuclear Power plants, as well as the fatally flawed Chernobyl style reactors at the Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant. And the aged first reactor unit at the Kola Nuclear Power Plant even received two life span extensions from Pulikovsky’s Rostekhnadzor.
Whether embarrassment continues remains to be seen
This last provoked outrage among Murmansk area environmentalists, and the Nature and Youth environmental organisation conducted a protest last spring in which they hung a banner from the entrance of the Rotekhnadzor building in Moscow. Pulikovsky had no reaction to the vociferous protest.
It would be hoped that the new management of Russian Federal Service for Ecological, Technological and Atomic Oversight will show themselves to fit their job descriptions as protectors of the interests of Russian citizens rather than the pliable puppets of Russia’s nuclear and oil industries.
Andrei Ozharovsky, a nuclear physicist with the environmental group Ecodefence, is a frequent contributor to Bellona Web.
A version of this op-ed was first published in The Moscow Times. For the past 40 years, the wastes of the Chernobyl site have stood as a monument ...
Bellona’s new Nuclear Digest for February is out now and catalogs a number of mounting pressures on Russia’s global nuclear footprint. From stalled p...
Over the past four years, civilian nuclear energy facilities have increasingly become targets of direct or indirect attacks in armed conflicts. The Z...
A new ISO standard was published last week to help port authorities, shipowners and operators navigate rules on how ships should be cleaned in an env...