News
Publish date: April 16, 2008
Written by: Vladimir Slivyak
Translated by: Charles Digges
News
The detentions are part of a growing trend in which nearly every environmental protest for the past seven months has been dispersed by police and resulted in arrests.
The prefecture of Moscow’s central region had initially declined permission for the protests. But when the prefecture was asked a second time by organisers, they agreed pursuant to one condition – that the protest be limited to only three activists.
The demonstration, nonetheless, attracted the participation of 10 people from Moscow’s Ecodefence, Nizhny Novgorod’s Anti-nuclear Movement of Nizhny Novgorod, and Murmansk’s Nature and Youth environmental organisation.
At about 1:00pm local time yesterday, activists unfurled a banner reading “Old reactors are the new Chernobyl” near the entrance to the RosTekhNadzor building. In the minutes following, two activists scaled the four metre canopy over the entrance to the building and unfurled another banner reading “Close Old Nuclear Power Plants.”
Photo: Ecoefence
“We are for the quickest shutdown of old nuclear reactors that have already exhausted their 30 year resources. There is not a single developed country on earth where such reactors would receive permission to operate at all,” said Ecodefence in statement.
“The further use of these energy blocks is extremely dangerous and threatens a repeat of Chernobyl.”
Ecologists confirm that permissions to extend the engineered life span of reactors at the Kola, Kursk, Novovoronezh, Leningrad and Biblin nuclear power plants have already gone through.
These energy blocks were designed long before the Chernobyl accident and it is possible to retrofit them to contemporary standards of safety that are the norm in Western Europe and the United States
By demand of the European Commission, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Ukraine, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, these old Soviet era reactors have been or are being taken out of service. However Russian authorities and the nuclear industry have not for the past 22 years realized all the dangers of the technology that led to the worst technical disaster in the history of the world.
Vladimir Slivyak is co-chairman of the Ecodefence environmental group.
Throughout the past year, our mission at the Bellona Environmental Transparency Center has focused on two key, but intertwined issues—nuclear and radiation safety as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine drags on, and the worldwide influence of Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear corporation, which itself is actively involved in the war and has participated in the occupation of a Ukrainian nuclear power plant.
At the beginning of the year, reports in the German and Russian press suggested an approximate 70% increase in uranium imports from Russia to Germany in 2024. But does this reflect broader European trends? It does not. Overall, imports of uranium and nuclear fuel from Russia to Western countries actually dropped sharply in 2024. Unlike the situation in Germany, this is already an established trend.
A Lingen, Germany plant could begin producing nuclear fuel in cooperation with a subsidiary of Rosatom, Russia's state nuclear corporation, which is directly involved in the war in Ukraine and occupying the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant.
In this news digest, we monitor events that impact the environment in the Russian Arctic. Our focus lies in identifying the factors that contribute to pollution and climate change.