News
Publish date: August 29, 2002
News
On Tuesday, Sosnovy Bors court in Leningrad county started considering an appeal, lodged by Sergey Kharitonov (ERC Bellona, St Petersburg). He claims, the decision to launch radioactive metal smelting plant Ecoment-S is illegal.
The radioactive metal smelting plant Ekomet-S is situated on the premises of the Leningrad Nuclear Power plant (LAES), only few hundred meters away from the shore of the Baltic Sea shore and four kilometres from Sosnovy Bor’s 60,000 inhabitants. The closed nuclear town itself is located 80km from St Petersburg.
The plant, already in operation, was built secretly and without the state environmental impact study, which is required by Russian legislation. That violates constitutional rights of people living here, Sergey Kharitonov says. Documents to launch the plant were signed on February 12th, 2002 by deputy Minister for Nuclear Energy Valery Lebedev.
The facility, which is devoted to the smelting and decontamination of radioactive metals for resale on the open market, was built by the Ministry for Nuclear Energy the notorious Minatom and fissile fuel monopolists hoping to cash in on the smelting of radioactive metal waste from nuclear power plants across Russia. Gazprom-bank invested $10m in the project. The plant is designed to melt up to 5,000 tons of scrap metal per year. The metal is contaminated by such radionuclides as Mn-54, Co-60, Zn-65, Ru-106, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-144, Sr-90.
Today the plant keeps on working. On August 18th, at 4.15 am, there was an accident with an emission of melted metal. One worker was burned up to 16% of the body, and was hospitalized. Study of technology is a part of the state environmental impact study.
When I lodged my complaint, I asked to halt the plant until the courts decision, and the accident could be avoided, Sergey Kharitonov says. Though the judge sent him a letter, asking if he was ready to pay for the damage, the plant would suffer, if its halted. Sergey answered, he was ready to pay, but we will speak about damages only after the state environmental impact study – All the amounts of profits Ecomet-S is mentioning now are groundless, because they dont count money they will surely have to pay for environmental damage. The judge took an one-month respite, and then answered to Sergey, the question was premature.
Yesterdays hearing was postponed to October, 16th, because in three months period, since the time Sergey filed his complaint, the court didnt find a chance to officially invite deputy Minister for Nuclear Energy to the trial. Its very strange, the court didnt do that in time, says Alexey Pavlov of ERC Bellona, Sergeys lawyer.
Earlier a similar suit was started at St Petersburgs arbitration court by the Sosnovy Bors Assembly of representatives. But finally, after three court sessions held, this local governmental was acknowledged to be not authorized to file such suits.
An accident aboard numerous Volgoneft oil tankers in the Kerch in mid December clearly show what can happen to aged ships when they are operated in bad weather—and when economic and military objectives are prioritized over the lives of crews and environmental safety.
In this news digest, we monitor events that impact the environment in the Russian Arctic. Our focus lies in identifying the factors that contribute to pollution and climate change.
A survey of events in the field of nuclear and radiation safety relating to Russia and Ukraine.
A visit last week by Vladimir Putin and a Kremlin entourage to Astana, Kazakhstan sought in part to put Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear corporation, on good footing with local officials.