Last remains of defunct Russian submarines to be taken off water next year

A nuclear submarine being dismantled.

Publish date: October 18, 2018

It took about 25 years of Russian elbow grease and billions of dollars in foreign funding, but as of six years ago, the dilapidated remains of the once-feared Soviet nuclear submarine fleet, one of the gravest environmental threats facing Northwest Russia and the world, was finally dismantled.

It took about 25 years of Russian elbow grease and billions of dollars in foreign funding, but as of six years ago, the dilapidated remains of the once-feared Soviet nuclear submarine fleet, one of the gravest environmental threats facing Northwest Russia and the world, was finally dismantled.

All but a few pieces, that is.

What has remained of the fearsome Cold Warriors, after they were cut to pieces by enormous saws and their spent nuclear fuel sent to safer storage, was a flotilla of irradiated reactor compartments, held buoyant in enormous steel cylinders at piers along Russia’s Arctic coast.

While not as dangerous as the used uranium at their cores, the submarine reactor compartments were still highly radioactive, and required storage at Sayda Bay a former military facility near Murmansk, which was retrofitted to keep them safe.

And now the last three of those compartments will finally be taken off the water and put onshore for storage by the end of next year, the semi-official Russian newspaper Izvestiya reports this week­– marking a quiet end to one of the most dramatic, and contentious, international nuclear security efforts ever.

At the height of their power, the Soviet Navy’s 200 nuclear submarines were the terror of the Cold War seas, able to submerge for months at a time and approach targets with little warning. For decades they played hide and seek with their American counterparts as the two sides sought to outdo each other in stealth and firepower.

Yet the Russians always seemed to have the upper hand. Moscow out-produced the US in the sheer number of nuclear submarines it had and their drive systems were sneakier, allowing them to operate in near silence as they shadowed their rivals through undersea canyons and poked their conning towers up near places like Cony Island and Cape Cod before submerging again and vanishing.

These disappearing acts were one of the central fears driving Washington’s nuclear efforts, and American schoolchildren were for decades taught how to shelter under their desks lest one of these submarines shower the country with nuclear warheads from a sly perch off the US coast.

sayda Sayda Bay. Credit:

When the Soviet Union suddenly dissolved in 1991, the vast majority of these submarines were parked at dockside and largely left to rust, presenting the world with a nuclear threat of a different kind.

Throughout the 1990s one desperate report after another emerged on the deteriorating condition of the once mighty submarines. Nearly all of them still had their nuclear fuel aboard but the Russian military, laid low by the economic chaos of the day, was out of money to take care of them.

The subs needed compressed air to keep them afloat, but time and again, the power company would shut of their electricity over the Navy’s unpaid bills. But keeping them afloat was vital. It was only way to prevent their reactors from becoming waterlogged and possibly sparking a chain reaction – and a nuclear blast off the coast of Murmansk, a city of 300,000.

bodytextimage_submarinedismnt.jpeg Russian submarines being dismantled. Credit: US Department of Defense

The situation was critical. Yet how could a navy –– which at one point publically begged Russia’s citizens for potatoes to feed its unpaid sailors ­–­– hope to grapple with the cost of safely decommissioning its submarines?

In 1995, a former Soviet submarine captain named Alexander Nikitin joined with Bellona to produce a report called” The Russian Northern Fleet: Sources of Radioactive Contamination,” which showed the world exactly how bad things had gotten.

But Moscow wasn’t anxious for the news to get out. In the vulnerable throes of its lost empire, the Kremlin launched an offensive against Nikitin, prosecuting him as a spy for his efforts to summon help.

Yet by the time he was acquitted in 2000, the report he co-authored had become a guidebook for American and European funding efforts to help safely dispose of the nuclear might that had become Russia’s environmental Achilles’ heel.

Now the last remains of these submarines – three enormous red barrels containing reactor compartments – will finally join 117 others at the onshore storage at Sayda Bay.

There they will sit on a concrete slab for the next few decades to come, until their radiation has abated enough for them to be cut up yet again and put into geologic storage.

But here another waiting game begins. Russia has only just begun to investigate cites suitable for the long-term underground storage of nuclear waste. So while the Soviet Navy is now a thing of the past, its grave has yet to be truly dug.

More News

All news

The role of CCS in Germany’s climate toolbox: Bellona Deutschland’s statement in the Association Hearing

After years of inaction, Germany is working on its Carbon Management Strategy to resolve how CCS can play a role in climate action in industry. At the end of February, the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action published first key points and a proposal to amend the law Kohlenstoffdioxid Speicherungsgesetz (KSpG). Bellona Deutschland, who was actively involved in the previous stakeholder dialogue submitted a statement in the association hearing.

Project LNG 2.

Bellona’s new working paper analyzes Russia’s big LNG ambitions the Arctic

In the midst of a global discussion on whether natural gas should be used as a transitional fuel and whether emissions from its extraction, production, transport and use are significantly less than those from other fossil fuels, Russia has developed ambitious plans to increase its own production of liquified natural gas (LNG) in the Arctic – a region with 75% of proven gas reserves in Russia – to raise its share in the international gas trade.