Four Demands for a Successful Long-Term Negative Emissions Strategy in Germany
To ensure that Germany achieves its goal of climate neutrality by 2045, negative emissions are necessary, as depicted in the global IPCC scenarios.
News
Publish date: December 4, 2003
Written by: Charles Digges
News
In contraction to statements made Tuesday by Andrei Illarionov, President Vladimir Putin’s chief economic advisor and a long-time opponent Russia’s signature on the Kyoto protocol, Tsikanov indicated Moscow was moving toward ratification of the treaty.
"As a major producer of carbon dioxide, Russia’s support is crucial to the treaty. Without it, the protocol cannot come into effect even if approved by every other eligible nation because only Russia’s industrial emissions are large enough to meet its target threshold," Tsikanov said in remarks reported by Interfax. "There are no decisions about ratification apart from the fact that we are moving toward ratification."
The statements were a contradiction of those made Tuesday by Illarionov—a long-time opponent Russia’s signature on the Kyoto protocol—whose office Thursday morning rushed to shoot down Tsikanov’s comments.
In its present form, this protocol cannot be ratified. It is impossible to undertake responsibilities that place serious limits on the country’s growth," said a spokesman in Illarionov’s office, who asked not to be identified by name, in a telephone interview with Bellona Web. The statement was an almost exact reiteration of what Illarionov had said Wednesday.
"The Kyoto protocol places practically un-surmountable limits on the tempo of the country’s economic growth, which has taken on the responsibility to limit carbon dioxide emissions," the spokesman said. This concerns not only Russia, the spokesman said, but the 38 other countries that are included the protocol. Should all of these counties ratify, said the spokesman, it will have "heavy economic consequences." Therefore, the spokesman summed up, refusing to sign the protocol is "one of the largest and most important decisions for Russia and other countries.
Economic and Trade Ministry contradicts Illarionov
A spokesman from the Economic and Trade Ministry retorted just as quickly in a telephone interview from Moscow that "Russia will ratify the protocol if it is proved that it is in our interest—all Russian political leaders have said so."
"There are no decisions about ratification apart from the fact that we are moving towards ratification," the spokesman told Bellona Web. "I cannot comment on statements from Illarionov’s office, but we do not have any information in the government about the fact that a decision has been made."
Signed-up nations watch Russia with anticipation
Signatory nations of the Kyoto Protocol are meeting this week and next in Milan, Italy, and are closely watching the Russian pendulum effect over whether Moscow will sign or not. Countries accounting for 44 percent of so-called greenhouse gas emissions have signed up for the protocol thus far.
But the protocol only comes into force if countries responsible for 55 percent of developed nations emissions approve it, meaning Russia—which emits 17 percent of the world’s greenhouse gasses—has the final vote as to whether the protocol will be adopted.
Illarionov has been one of protocol’s harshest critics in Russia, while the Economic Development and Trade Ministry has been one of its most ardent supporters. Putin has cast deep doubts on Moscow’s willingness to ratify it, but has not ruled it out entirely in public comments.
Tsikanov has optimistically said the government might submit the decision on the protocol to parliament next year, Interfax reported.
The ultimate decision as to whether Russia will ratify the document lies with the State Duma and with Putin’s signature on the law that would pass it. But Russia holds Duma elections on Sunday, and the new Duma will not meet until January.
Why is Russia tap-dancing?
But Putin dismayed an environmental conference two months ago by retreating from previous government promises to ratify, saying Russia needed to check if the pact would harm Russia’s economy. Since then, Kremlin officials, including Illarionov, have said Moscow wants guarantees from western nations that they would buy Russia’s substantial excess emission quotas—something permitted in the pact—if it does ratify the treaty.
It was remained unclear what was behind the mixed signals over the protocol in Russia, although some analysts have suggested they are a negotiating tactic meant to sap concessions from the European Union and Japan.
Most say Russia stands to gain from the pact because its industry has collapsed since 1990, when emission levels were set, and it has large spare capacity to trade in these emissions.
"After the US departure the economic effectiveness of the pact for Russia fell, but it does exist," Tsikanov said.
The United States pulled out of Kyoto in 2001 and said its own policy of promoting "breakthrough technologies" for energy was the "only acceptable cost-effective option" to limit greenhouse gases.
To ensure that Germany achieves its goal of climate neutrality by 2045, negative emissions are necessary, as depicted in the global IPCC scenarios.
A survey of events in the field of nuclear and radiation safety relating to Russia and Ukraine.
Transport on the Northern Sea Route is not sustainable, and Kirkenes must not become a potential hub for transport along the Siberian coast. Bellona believes this is an important message Norway should deliver in connection with the Prime Minister's visit to China. In an open letter to Jonas Gahr Støre, Bellona asks the Prime Minister to make it clear that the Chinese must stop shipping traffic through the Northeast Passage.
The International Atomic Energy Agency has published a new report on its efforts to ensure nuclear safety and security during the conflict in Ukraine, with the agency’s director-general warning that the situation at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power station remains “precarious and very fragile.”