Monthly Highlights from the Russian Arctic, October 2024
In this news digest, we monitor events that impact the environment in the Russian Arctic. Our focus lies in identifying the factors that contribute to pollution and climate change.
News
Publish date: May 18, 2018
News
To make the most of the steadily growing renewable power and address the urgent need to tackle climate change, renewable electricity sources should be used to provide the greatest amount of climate and environmental benefits. The most effective use of this valuable resource should be prioritised. As it stands, the synthetic fuels of non-biological origin target of the Renewable Energy Directive (II) will end up wasting renewable power, squander subsidies, preserve fossil power on the grid and keep fossil cars on the road.
Direct use of renewables offers the largest carbon mitigation potential
The more of renewable electricity we use directly, the more climate benefit that renewable electricity will provide. Results from the European Commission’s official science and knowledge service, the Joint Research Centre, confirm this; Their calculations show that using wind electricity as a direct replacement for coal and other fossil producers of electricity such as natural gas, gives by far the most climate benefits:
‘’Using wind electricity as a substitute for coal electricity is the most efficient option for GHG savings.’’ (Edwards et al. 2014)
Using the electricity from a wind turbine instead of electricity from a coal power plant is more than 7 times more effective in reducing emissions than taking that same electricity and turning it into synthetic methanol or e-diesel (in the revised Renewable Energy Directive, these fuels go by the name of renewable fuels of non-biological origin – RFNBOs).
When we put these fuels into a tank of a diesel car, they give an even smaller bang for that initial buck (unit of electricity) due to the high inefficiency of the engine.
Wasting the resources that we have to decarbonise our society just to keep fossil cars on the road is not a good deal. In fact, supporting such technologies in a grid that is not entirely clean could actually increase emissions (Edwards et al. 2014).
Ultimately, these technologies could hold us hostage in a fossil system: reducing the amount of renewables on the grid, keeping coal running, emissions rising and diesel cars on the streets for decades to come.
In this news digest, we monitor events that impact the environment in the Russian Arctic. Our focus lies in identifying the factors that contribute to pollution and climate change.
A survey of events in the field of nuclear and radiation safety relating to Russia and Ukraine.
A visit last week by Vladimir Putin and a Kremlin entourage to Astana, Kazakhstan sought in part to put Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear corporation, on good footing with local officials.
Russia is formally withdrawing from a landmark environmental agreement that channeled billions in international funding to secure the Soviet nuclear legacy, leaving undone some of the most radioactively dangerous projects and burning one more bridge of potential cooperation with the West.