News

Norwegian gas power plant in Mongstad meeting its end

Mongstad
Mongstad
Statoil

Publish date: February 15, 2017

“A project with catastrophic consequences for both climate and economy” – says Bellona leader Fredric Hauge.

Six years and 3.8 million tons of CO2 later, Statoil made a clear statement February 15th; the gas power plant in Mongstad is shutting down.

FH4 Fredric Hauge Credit: Bellona

– This is about time. The gas power plant has been a poor investment and should have never been built in the first place, says Bellona leader Frederic Hauge.

Hauge sees this as a turning point in the race between gas and renewable energies.

– This shows us that renewables are simply outcompeting gas – also in Statoil, who was planning to expand its gas power plants in Kårstø, Kollsnes and Mongstad. All this is now put on ice, says Frederic Hauge, implying that Statoil prognoses have been little reliable.

– Their prognoses have led to massive malinvestments. Politicians will now, based on Statoil’s prognoses, decide on the expansion of oil and gas fields that will stick around for the next  40 years. What is happening with Mongstad today, should send a signal of seriously risky business, says Hauge.

Back in 2006 Norway’s government granted approval to Statoil to build the gas power plant in Mongstad. A few years later, the government started supporting the expansion of renewable energy, which today has resulted in a surplus of power in Norway. The gas power plant in Kårstø is already shut down, and the power plant in Mongstad has been unprofitable for several years.

ThinkstockPhotos-477249082-1 Credit: Think Stock

– When the large gas power plant shuts down, Norway’s emissions will decrease by 300 000 tons of CO2 per year. However, the oil refinery in Mongstad, which is not shutting down, still emits above one million tons. Statoil still needs to invest in CO2 capture and storage (CCS), says Hauge.

Today, the test center in Mongstad uses flue gas from the gas power plant to enhance CO2 capture. After 2019, the flue gas from the refinery will be stripped of CO2.

Bellona believes the state together with Gassnova, the Norwegian state enterprise dealing with CCS, must go “all the way in” – to both capture and store the CO2 from the oil refinery:

– Refineries are Norway’s largest emission sources. Mongstad must transition from being a test area to actually capturing and storing CO2 on full scale, says Hauge.

There is already a gas pipeline connecting Mongstad to Kollsnes, which Statoil has pointed out as the best place for shipping out the CO2 to for storage in the North Sea.

More News

All news

The role of CCS in Germany’s climate toolbox: Bellona Deutschland’s statement in the Association Hearing

After years of inaction, Germany is working on its Carbon Management Strategy to resolve how CCS can play a role in climate action in industry. At the end of February, the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action published first key points and a proposal to amend the law Kohlenstoffdioxid Speicherungsgesetz (KSpG). Bellona Deutschland, who was actively involved in the previous stakeholder dialogue submitted a statement in the association hearing.

Project LNG 2.

Bellona’s new working paper analyzes Russia’s big LNG ambitions the Arctic

In the midst of a global discussion on whether natural gas should be used as a transitional fuel and whether emissions from its extraction, production, transport and use are significantly less than those from other fossil fuels, Russia has developed ambitious plans to increase its own production of liquified natural gas (LNG) in the Arctic – a region with 75% of proven gas reserves in Russia – to raise its share in the international gas trade.