Bellona nuclear digest. February 2024
A survey of events in the field of nuclear and radiation safety relating to Russia and Ukraine.
News
Publish date: October 1, 2008
Written by: Andrey Ozharovsky
Translated by: Charles Digges
News
The conference on Monday comprised all 145 member states of the IAEA and will continue until Friday, with the aim of confirming the agency’s programme and budget for the coming year – and to discuss its most pressing problems.
On the conference’s first day, ElBaradei began with a stark and jolting statement: "The problems facing the world in the nuclear arena are plain for all of us to see," he said according the IAEA’s transcript of his statement.
"But I must stand here today and let you know that all is not well with the IAEA."
It has been difficult, as of late, to characterise the IAEA’s activities as successful. More and more states are striving to master nuclear weapons. The number of accidents taking place at nuclear power stations and nuclear fuel cycle installations is rising.
Many are bearing witness to the fact that producing energy by splitting atoms is outmoded technology from the 20th century – and that continuing its use into the 21st century is not, in the very least, honorable.
Moreover, the goal of the IAEA’s creation already seems a little anachronistic.
In its charter, which was ratified in 1956, it says: “The Agency strives to achieve more rapid and wide use of atomic energy for the support of peace, health and well being of the entire world.”
A half a century ago, it may have seemed that the “peaceful atom” would have brought with it peace, prosperity and health. But now it is more than clear that this has not happened.
The proliferation of nuclear technology has brought risks not only to the environment but to the peace and economic development.
The IAEA, nevertheless, survives on the donations of its member countries and continued to represent the interests of the strongest nuclear lobbies. Delegates at the 52 Annual Conference of the IAEA, representing their national nuclear industries, would hardly turn down the role of playing the movers and shakers that continue ot support the outmoded and dangerous nuclear technology.
ElBaradei himself, having begun with his shocking statement on the state of the organisation he controls, came to a very simple conclusion, which requires more money and more power.
"We really have reached a turning point," he said. “The Agency can do much to meet the world’s nuclear challenges, he emphasized – if given the authority, resources, personnel, and technology.”
The nuclear lobby has evidently stumbled on hard times if not even the IAEA is not sure of its own powers.
A full text of ElBaradei’s statements is available here.
Andrei Ozharovsky, a physicist with the Ecodefence group, is a frequent contributor to Bellona Web.
A survey of events in the field of nuclear and radiation safety relating to Russia and Ukraine.
What’s wrong with Russia’s official documents on the Arctic.
As uranium supplies from Russia fall under the shadow of potential sanctions, and while Ukraine’s allies look to wean themselves off nuclear fuel produced by Moscow’s Rosatom corporation, owners of left-for-dead mines in the US are looking to revive their deposits.
The European Union doubled its purchases of Russian nuclear fuel in 2023, data from Eurostat and the UN’s international trade service Comtrade show.