Monthly Highlights from the Russian Arctic, October 2024
In this news digest, we monitor events that impact the environment in the Russian Arctic. Our focus lies in identifying the factors that contribute to pollution and climate change.
News
Publish date: February 14, 2013
Written by: Charles Digges
News
Chernobyl spokespeople said radiation levels remained unaffected after the 6,500 square foot section of roof over the machine hall at the exploded reactor No 4 gave way.
No one was hurt when the roof buckled. The French firms of Vinci and Bouygues, who are building the roof structure, said they had evacuated around 80 employees as a precaution, according to the Daily Telegraph.
Photo: Ukrainian State Inspection
A new, giant, arch-shaped confinement is currently being constructed over the old sarcophagus covering Chernobyl’s reactor No 4. The construction of the new shelter was not affected by the accident, said Anton Usov, spokesman for the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which runs the $2 billion project co-sponsored by the bank and international donors.
The 1986 explosion and meltdown at Chernobyl’s reactor No 4 was the world’s worst-ever nuclear accident, rivaled only by the Fukushima triple-meltdown of March 11, 2011. Both accidents were classified level 7 events on the International Nuclear Event Scale, but radiation released from Chernobyl disaster spread much further than that from Fukushima so far.
Though yesterday’s incident led to no casualties and no increases in radiation levels, the roof collapse is bound to revive concerns about the condition of the defunct power plant.
“This shows the importance of upping the tempo of work to build the new sarcophagus at Chernobyl,” said Nils Bøhmer, Bellona’s general manager and nuclear physicist.
“It also shows that Japan must be very focused in its efforts to secure the radiation in the destroyed reactors at Fukushima,” he said.
“There are no changes in the radiation situation at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant or in the exclusion zone,” Chernobyl’s administrators said in a statement.
The affected area was about 50 meters away from the cement sarcophagus built in the aftermath of the 1986 disaster to contain leaking radiation from the exploded reactor, Chernobyl spokeswoman Maya Rudenko told the Associated Press.
“Everyone should stay calm,” Rudenko said. “Yes it is unpleasant, but there is no danger.”
The huge new containment structure is currently being built to slide over reactor No 4, amid concerns about the long-term viability of the existing cement sarcophagus, which over years has developed cracks – though they have not released radiation.
The concrete shell’s construction is headed up by the French firms.
The explosion at Chernobyl’s reactor No 4 – when Ukraine was still part of the Soviet Union – sent a huge plume of radiation across Europe. Some 115,000 people were evacuated from their homes in Ukraine, western Russia and Belarus.
The Soviet government under Mikhail Gorbachev denied the catastrophe for several days until mounting evidence from radiation monitoring authorities in Nordic and European countries and seismology institutes as far away as Great Britain and the United States became too overwhelming to ignore.
The number of people who died because of the accident remains controversial, but thousands – hundreds of thousands by some estimates – are thought to be at higher risk of cancer as a result of exposure to radiation. The Ukrainian government has meanwhile stood by its initial 1986 death toll of 31.
The area around the plant is heavily contaminated and a 30km exclusion zone is in force.
In this news digest, we monitor events that impact the environment in the Russian Arctic. Our focus lies in identifying the factors that contribute to pollution and climate change.
A survey of events in the field of nuclear and radiation safety relating to Russia and Ukraine.
A visit last week by Vladimir Putin and a Kremlin entourage to Astana, Kazakhstan sought in part to put Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear corporation, on good footing with local officials.
Russia is formally withdrawing from a landmark environmental agreement that channeled billions in international funding to secure the Soviet nuclear legacy, leaving undone some of the most radioactively dangerous projects and burning one more bridge of potential cooperation with the West.