News
Publish date: December 1, 2017
News
BRUSSELS – Tuesday 28 November, Members of the Environment Committee of the European Parliament called for a ban on the use of heavy fuel oil (HFO) in the Arctic and for setting up greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets by 2023. This acts to put pressure on the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) to take action on the global level. So far, the IMO has failed to act on shipping CO2 emissions and as a result, the shipping sector remains one of the most challenging sectors for reducing emissions.
Bellona has for a long time pursued the banning of HFO in the Arctic, together with Arctic express Hurtigruten and Clean Arctic Alliance, among others. In June this year, a HFO ban was supported by The Norwegian Shipowners’ Association.
In February, a Bellona conference in the north of Norway presented several reasons for putting a moratorium on HFO in the Arctic, obviously including the risk of accidents and oil spills in bad weather conditions, the lack of infrastructure in the arctic to deal with those, but also the delicate Arctic ecosystem itself, which could hardly sustain such a blow. In addition, black carbon (soot) from shipping is accumulating on Arctic ice cover, further accelerating ice melt.
HFO is the cheapest marine fuel and accounts for three quarters of all fuel carried in the fuel tanks of ships sailing in the Arctic. According to Clean Arctic Alliance, black carbon emissions resulting from HFO use are expected to increase rapidly in the coming years due to more abundant Arctic traffic.
Best available technologies must be used in the Arctic, such as hybrid and electric technology. But first it’s important to take the first step – to ban the dirtiest and cheapest fuel.
“The Arctic ecosystems are under pressure from human impact and a HFO ban in the Arctic is an important and feasible action for IMO to put into force. Even IMO’s Polar Code advice ships to drop HFO in Arctic waters. It’s time to make the advice mandatory and backing from Brussels is most welcome and underline the message to the IMO members states to act” comments Bellona’s shipping, marine- and Arctic issues manager Sigurd Enge.
Both Arctic HFO and climate action will be discussed in the IMO’s environment committee in April 2018. Meanwhile, the Parliament’s vote sends a strong signal from the EU that it will take action if IMO still lags behind.
Recent attacks on Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant "mark the beginning of a new and gravely dangerous front of the war," the UN atomic agency's director general said last week.
After years of inaction, Germany is working on its Carbon Management Strategy to resolve how CCS can play a role in climate action in industry. At the end of February, the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action published first key points and a proposal to amend the law Kohlenstoffdioxid Speicherungsgesetz (KSpG). Bellona Deutschland, who was actively involved in the previous stakeholder dialogue submitted a statement in the association hearing.
In the midst of a global discussion on whether natural gas should be used as a transitional fuel and whether emissions from its extraction, production, transport and use are significantly less than those from other fossil fuels, Russia has developed ambitious plans to increase its own production of liquified natural gas (LNG) in the Arctic – a region with 75% of proven gas reserves in Russia – to raise its share in the international gas trade.
In this news digest, we monitor events that impact the environment in the Russian Arctic. Our main focus lies in identifying the factors that contribute to pollution risks and climate change.